The tumultuous 2016 election and the improbable result has
left many political elites and mainstream media outlets firing out many
scapegoats for the wackiness. One of the
more hotly debated topics is that of so-called “fake-news”. Many small outlets do thrive on a strategic
plan of disseminating content with inflammatory titles to get attention, but
eventually proven totally baseless and false.
These sites are limited in scope and even more limited in the audience
which regards them as gospel. The far
bigger piece of the pie consists of factual news reporting and opinion pieces
or satire. These opinion pieces are
threatened the most by this new onslaught of the desire to censor.
From a single fact, there are countless ways to interpret or
present it. The crusade against “fake
news” is in danger of tearing down a wall between the free speech which has
been present on the internet since the beginning and governments desire to
suppress it. In the near future,
communications professionals should do their best to resist the urge that they
know how to choose truth from fiction for the rest of their fellow
citizens. Speech exists not in a vacuum,
but a marketplace of ideas, where competing narratives battle for popularity
among the masses. There is not
preferential treatment given to one idea by a small body of people, but instead
it is scrutinized by society. As the
social media giants have taken a stance that this is a problem that they need
to fix, they have telegraphed their intentions.
They are not always in the interest of the people and sometimes may give
more respect to their investors and employees than serving the needs of the
people. Communications professionals should
take this, not as a limitation of social media, but an opportunity. Not every company is impervious to
competition and when the value to the customer declines, new entrepreneurs and
start-up companies can take the forgotten markets and become tomorrow’s social
networks.